Home

II. The Cyclohexadienone Annulation of Disubstituted Unsaturated Complexes

 

Carbene Complexes

Introduction

 I. Benzannulation Reaction

II. Cyclohexadienone Annulation

III. Tautomer Arrested Annulation

IV. Aldol Reaction

V. Diels-Alder Reaction

VI. Cyclobutanone Formation

VII. Biaryl Synthesis

VIII. Macrocycles 

 

Asymmetric Catalysis

ILigand Design and Synthesis

II. Asymmetric Diels-Alder Reaction

IIIImino Aldol Reaction

IVAsymmetric Aziridination

 

Synthesis of Natural Products and Pharmaceuticals 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cyclohexadienones of the type 42 are produced from the reactions of unsaturated carbene complexes and alkynes when the beta-carbon of the carbene complex is disubstituted (Scheme V) [1].  This is presumed to be the result of the fact that if substituents R1 and R2 in intermediate 16 (see also Scheme II) are both non-hydrogen, then tautomerization to the aromatized phenol is not possible and as a result the cyclohexadienone 42 is isolated after the metal is lost.  This reaction is quite general for a variety of alkenyl complexes as is illustrated by the reaction of complex 43 with alkyne 44 [2]. This process can also be extended to indole carbene complexes [3]. The reaction of complex 47 with 3-hexyne gives the cyclohexadienone annulated product 48 in 95 % yield.  In this reaction, part of the aromaticity of the indole ring is lost.  The aromaticity can be restored by a 1,5-sigmatropic shift in the cyclohexadienone.  This is illustrated in the reaction of complex 49 with a protected 5-amino-1-pentyne to give the cyclohexadienone 50.  This compound can be isolated, or if heated to 140 oC it will undergo a rearrangement to the isomeric cyclohexadienone 51 in 61 % overall yield.  This combination of cyclohexadienone annulation and 1,5-sigmatropic shift allows for an efficient entry to the aspidospermadine alkaloids [4].

 

Asymmetric induction in the cyclohexadienone annulation can occur in several different modes (Scheme VI). The cyclohexadienone annulation produces a new chiral center at carbon 6 in the cyclohexadienone. Therefore, there can be a central-to-central chirality transfer from a center of chirality that is present in either the alkyne, the carbene carbon substituent or in the heteroatom stabilizing substituent on the carbene complex. We have reported a number of examples of chirality transfer from a chiral center in the carbene ligand [5].  As illustrated by the reaction of complex 55, there can be good asymmetric induction from a chiral center present on the carbene carbon substituent.  In this case, there is a 92 : 8 selectivity for the trans-decalindieone 56 with trimethylsilyl acetylene and similar selectivities were noted with other alkynes. A reduced selectivity is observed if the methyl group is in the 3-position of the cyclohexene ring. 

The only examples of asymmetric induction from chiral heteroatom substituted carbene complexes involve chiral imidazolidinone complexes [6]. Complex 58 will react with 1-pentyne to give the cyclohexadienone 59 with greater than 98 : 2 selectivity.  Imidazolidinone complexes of the type 58 exist as isolable atropisomers.   The atropisomer of 58 reacts with 1-pentyne to give the epimer of 59 also with a 98 : 2 selectivity.   As in the benzannulation reaction, the asymmetric cyclohexadienone annulation occurs with high inductions with chiral propargylic ethers [7]. The reaction of the E-carbene complex 60 with alkyne 40 gives a 92 : 8 selectivity for the cyclohexadienone 61 in 73 % yield. This reaction is also stereospecific since reaction of alkyne 40 with the Z-isomer of carbene complex 60 gives the diastereomer 62 as the major product with similar stereoselectivity ( 91 : 9).  This reaction provides for a unique method for 1,4-asymmetric induction in the construction of highly functionalized cyclohexadienone and its utilization in total synthesis is currently ongoing in our research group.


[1] Tang, P. C.; Wulff, W. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 1132.

[2] Gilbertson, S. R.; Wulff, W. D., Synlett, 1989, 47.

[3] Bauta, W. E.; Wulff, W. D.; Pavkovic, S. F.; Zaluzec, E. J., J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 3249.

[4] Quinn, J. F.; Bos, M. E.; Wulff, W. D., Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 161.

[5] Hsung, R. P.; Wulff, W. D.; Challener, C. A., Synthesis, 1996, 773.

[6] Quinn, J. F.; Powers, T. S.; Wulff, W. D.; Yap, G. P. A.; Rheingold, A. L., Organometallics, 1997, 16, 4945.

[7] Hsung, R. P.; Quinn, J. F.; Weisenberg, B. A.; Wulff, W. D.; Yap, G. P. A.; Rheingold, A. L., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1997, 615.